The Nature of the Beast Exposed

HnC has a theory that pro-violence bloggers like “Nature of the Beast” Anon and Observer are actually working against the cause of freedom bloggers.

HnC also believes these bloggers have had some military training (possibly military intelligence) in pyschological warfare and effective use of propoganda.

To test this, HnC posted “Fighting Fire With Fire” calling on the workers of Fiji to unite and bring this IG to its knees through the nationwide strike planned for 19 July.

We knew from Maha Chodo’s recent public revelations that the military and its puppet IG were showing signs that they were already “weak in the knees” - that the situation for them was getting very desperate.

The article, it was envisaged, would therefore attract the support of real anti-coup supporters because the initiative by the Unions could potentially undermine the stability of the military IG.

If my assumption was correct, this would draw Anon and Observer out into a defensive position, ie. to discourage the strike - because their real job is to protect the military IG, not to destabilize it!

The “assumption” was that the two are in fact military bloggers disguised as staunch anti-coup supporters - their true agenda being two-fold - (1) to disrupt debate on the blogs; and (2) to demoralise the people of Fiji into believing they cannot do anything about this coup.

You may ask if they are military, then why promote violence against the military? The answer is simplier than you think - because the military already have contingency plans for the very actions Anon and Observer are proposing.

So HnC posted the article and waited for Anon or Observer to respond.

The response was better than we expected. They “both” came out with their guns blazing trying to downplay the impact that striking workers will have on the economy and the military IG.

Did I say “both”, I meant Observer (aka Anon) came out with HIS guns blazing…

You see, Observer’s IP at 10:29pm on “Fighting Fire With Fire” is exactly the same as Anon’s IP at 10:54pm. The email addresses were disguised but not the IP and certainly not the message.

Methinks Observer/Anon that you’ve just been exposed as being one and the same person.

And now, we determine your true agenda.

The message by Observer/Anon is as clear as day - a strike is useless, the military will crush you if you do it, the only people that will suffer are striking workers themselves, DO NOT GO ON STRIKE.

I think I remember seeing this same message on pro-coup military blogs.

Observer 10:44pm (Lawyers Petition) really over-played his hand when he started to discredit honourbale members of the judiciary.

He made two mistakes.

First, he assumed he could easily deceive us. Then he assumed that we were as gulliable as his colleagues in the military.

He assumed that if he placed a couple of rotten eggs in the egg tray, showed us that they were rotten, then tell us the whole tray was rotten - that we would believe him.

It’s actually a rather rudamentry propoganda tactic, ie. to place a few known truths in between a couple of big lies in order to give those lies a false sense of credibility.

Observer began his 10:44pm comment by discrediting Gates, Byrnes and Shameem sisters (known bad eggs) with things we had heard before and know to be true. This was to prepare us for the propoganda he was about to feed us on the real targets of his attack - Judge Winters, Judge Coventry and Judge Ward.

Sorry mate but you would have to get up really early in the morning to pull that one on the readers of this blog.

Please try again later.

The second telling mistake by Observer is publishing very detailed personal information which which is aimed at tainting the good names and reputations of the three judges he singled out.

Considering the source, the truth of the information it seems is not very credible at all.

This information is not readily available on the internet so we must question where did he get it from?

It seems precisely like the kind of information gathered by Military Ints through intel exchange and surveillance and collected and collated for the purpose of blackmailing targets to do (or not to do) certain things.

The more pertinent question is why did these judges get singled out by Observer?

All I know about these judges is that they have all recently criticised the illegal regime in one form or another - Judge Ward in his now famous speech at the LAWASIA Convention and in his recent rulings in the Rt Inoke Takiveikata Case and Angie Heffernan Case; and Judge Coventry in his recent ruling that the PSC Memo targeting law firms Munro Leys and Howard, was in fact illegal and invalid.

HnC is not sure yet what Judge Winters did recently to piss off the military IG but if we can find out, it would be very difficult for Observer to explain why he is targeting all three judges known to have ruled against the military IG - or indeed why he is trying to scare union members and union officials from going on strike!

Bottom line methinks is that Observer has exposed himself to be a coup-supporter and a military blogger.

The reason therefore why he (as Anon) understands the “nature of the beast” so well is that he is a part of that beast.

These are my conclusions, but I’ll let you be the judge.

Source